|
Observation and Perspective
|
| Ride Stats |
|
Distance:
4.69 miles
|
Time: 00:13:30
|
Max Speed:
29.30 mph
|
|
Avg Speed:
20.84 mph
|
Temp:
Avg: 73
|
Category: general: testing -
solo
|
|
Route:
on the Canal
|
Weight:
235
|
Altitude Gain:
231 ft
|
|
Avg Power: 0 W
|
Calories Burned: 0
|
Avg HR: 0 bpm
|
|
Terrain: Road: Flat
|
Bike: Juiced CCX Road
|
Club: USA Towpath and Trail Riders association |
| Weather Conditions: sunny and warm, WSW breeze |
|
Distance:
4.69 miles
|
Time: 00:21:57
|
Max Speed:
22.96 mph
|
|
Avg Speed:
12.82 mph
|
Temp:
Avg: 73
|
Category: general: testing -
solo
|
|
Route:
on the Canal
|
Weight:
235
|
Altitude Gain:
224 ft
|
|
Avg Power: 0 W
|
Calories Burned: 0
|
Avg HR: 0 bpm
|
|
Terrain: Road: Flat
|
Bike: Specialized 40lb-Globe 700c Hybrid
|
Club: USA Towpath and Trail Riders association |
| Weather Conditions: sunny and warming |
|
Today's intervals were the same route as yesterday. I chose to do the rides exactly opposite with regard to 1st bike used and route direction.
One interesting observation is Garmin's caloric burn estimate. Although the Garmin shows otherwise, I of course I burned more calories on the non electric Globe. And although the Garmin unit has no way of discerning the difference in bikes, the Garmin calculation for the Globe use would be the more accurate estimate. From the globe caloric burn per minute, I can calculate a more accurate calorie burn for the use of the CCX.
I did the 2nd interval today on the Globe;
8 mph slower than cycling with the CCX
15.3 k-calories/minute
0 member views | 6282 total views
report problem |
|
|
|
| My Recent Threads |
11/25 - Ebikes
11/11 - Trouble Renewing membership
12/22 - Status listing is inorrect
|
|
more...
